Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-10-19 19:46:02 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: EE5475D99DCE107DF14723ABDF816400C1D8FE50E779DC01E622710509C87350
Participant Details
Original Note:
There is no factual documentation shown (emails or other communication) between influencer and brand to support this claim either than word of mouth. Word of mouth is considered “hearsay” and is not sufficient in claiming evidence of a factual interaction happening. https://www.stimmel-law.com/en/articles/hearsay-evidence-basics#:~:text=For%20something%20to%20be%20hearsay,person%20is%20not%20in%20court.
All Note Details