Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-10-19 19:58:03 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 145881CFCB1A61AB02B8839FCD9F897743AB5B8361BECA4C370AA2B14C1F274D
Participant Details
Original Note:
There is no factual documentation shown (emails or other communication) between influencer and brand to support this claim either than word of mouth. Word of mouth is considered “hearsay” and is not sufficient in claiming evidence of a factual interaction happening. https://www.stimmel-law.com/en/articles/hearsay-evidence-basics#:~:text=For%20something%20to%20be%20hearsay,person%20is%20not%20in%20court.
All Note Details