Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-10-19 19:56:55 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 5E13B6C6CC76F5D16349D3AF959F0C83566D8F5C2B7ECF7E4D7D4FFA6E6BDD25
Participant Details
Original Note:
There is no factual documentation shown (emails or other communication) between influencer and brand to support this claim either than word of mouth. Word of mouth is considered “hearsay” and is not sufficient in claiming evidence of a factual interaction happening. https://www.stimmel-law.com/en/articles/hearsay-evidence-basics#:~:text=For%20something%20to%20be%20hearsay,person%20is%20not%20in%20court.
All Note Details