Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-10-19 19:50:44 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 85197B993C779FF7966A028BF8A47D752B468539FC6D014C0DF4A4F0574039E4
Participant Details
Original Note:
There is no factual documentation shown (emails or other communication) between influencer and brand to support this claim either than word of mouth. Word of mouth is considered “hearsay” and is not sufficient in claiming evidence of a factual interaction happening. https://www.stimmel-law.com/en/articles/hearsay-evidence-basics#:~:text=For%20something%20to%20be%20hearsay,person%20is%20not%20in%20court.
All Note Details