Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-10-19 19:42:54 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 016E53E7A2DB6A9008D4B4FB91D97E9044D495D401970244EE2A87AE898067C9
Participant Details
Original Note:
There is no factual documentation shown (emails or other communication) between influencer and brand to support this claim either than word of mouth. Word of mouth is considered “hearsay” and is not sufficient in claiming evidence of a factual interaction happening. https://www.stimmel-law.com/en/articles/hearsay-evidence-basics#:~:text=For%20something%20to%20be%20hearsay,person%20is%20not%20in%20court.
All Note Details