Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-10-19 22:05:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 35555645300C3C62B775F2030DAE35E51D57D26E7B83D9A892A7DCA69787550F
Participant Details
Original Note:
There is no factual documentation shown (emails or other communication) between influencer and brand to support this claim either than word of mouth. Word of mouth is considered “hearsay” and is not sufficient in claiming evidence of a factual interaction happening. https://www.stimmel-law.com/en/articles/hearsay-evidence-basics#:~:text=For%20something%20to%20be%20hearsay,person%20is%20not%20in%20court.
All Note Details