Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-04-29 08:24:10 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

DOJ argues discrimination on the basis of “medical necessity” to which there is no consensus, and complicated by comorbidity factors. https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1581636/download “Currently, there is no universally sanctioned definition of “medical necessity”, but in clinical practice for gender affirming care” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8861822/#bib13

Written by AF61FAFBD029A130CFC876BC187254C4CB7BB539FC7E9214FFF52B1A523EDCD0
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 1652227261213360128
• noteId - 1652227261213360128
• participantId -
• noteAuthorParticipantId - AF61FAFBD029A130CFC876BC187254C4CB7BB539FC7E9214FFF52B1A523EDCD0 Participant Details
• createdAtMillis - 1682756650629
• tweetId - 1652194922676768768
• classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
• believable -
• harmful -
• validationDifficulty -
• misleadingOther - 0
• misleadingFactualError - 0
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 0
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
• trustworthySources - 1
• summary
• DOJ argues discrimination on the basis of “medical necessity” to which there is no consensus, and complicated by comorbidity factors. https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1581636/download “Currently, there is no universally sanctioned definition of “medical necessity”, but in clinical practice for gender affirming care” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8861822/#bib13