Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-04-29 18:52:00 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: E04CB90BA3E6D9C8ACDA1571F987EB0A9CE2406A56B92C11452E068CC9E23C25
Participant Details
Original Note:
DOJ argues discrimination on the basis of “medical necessity” to which there is no consensus, and complicated by comorbidity factors. https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1581636/download “Currently, there is no universally sanctioned definition of “medical necessity”, but in clinical practice for gender affirming care” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8861822/#bib13
All Note Details