Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-04-30 05:22:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 069D4D246A8C7AD09B0E8B10C89FBEC0E3D7A8B93E3FC97595AFACF0272C2E8F
Participant Details
Original Note:
DOJ argues discrimination on the basis of “medical necessity” to which there is no consensus, and complicated by comorbidity factors. https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1581636/download “Currently, there is no universally sanctioned definition of “medical necessity”, but in clinical practice for gender affirming care” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8861822/#bib13
All Note Details