Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-04-29 13:46:37 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 3595F13BC5FADDB9C3153B6AFBE6636F7FDB41413235D464D71CFB5D47582350
Participant Details
Original Note:
DOJ argues discrimination on the basis of “medical necessity” to which there is no consensus, and complicated by comorbidity factors. https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1581636/download “Currently, there is no universally sanctioned definition of “medical necessity”, but in clinical practice for gender affirming care” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8861822/#bib13
All Note Details