Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-04-29 15:44:29 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 3F51EA8A94621D09B1146BABD6A97C4317B10AE5E1F9A9758032E16A288E304D
Participant Details
Original Note:
DOJ argues discrimination on the basis of “medical necessity” to which there is no consensus, and complicated by comorbidity factors. https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1581636/download “Currently, there is no universally sanctioned definition of “medical necessity”, but in clinical practice for gender affirming care” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8861822/#bib13
All Note Details