Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-04-29 12:00:15 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 0337D1C94A5D925FEA9F54552ECDBB9D9A796AE29C5C94A513C998CC69DA1BA0
Participant Details
Original Note:
DOJ argues discrimination on the basis of “medical necessity” to which there is no consensus, and complicated by comorbidity factors. https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1581636/download “Currently, there is no universally sanctioned definition of “medical necessity”, but in clinical practice for gender affirming care” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8861822/#bib13
All Note Details