Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-04-30 05:22:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 5B89492946B9FD7B5A5E7D8E7E5E5C840A0D84A62365B5935C6F8F7BE1713DF4
Participant Details
Original Note:
DOJ argues discrimination on the basis of “medical necessity” to which there is no consensus, and complicated by comorbidity factors. https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1581636/download “Currently, there is no universally sanctioned definition of “medical necessity”, but in clinical practice for gender affirming care” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8861822/#bib13
All Note Details