Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-04-30 02:13:14 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: BE9B8F75ABE2F0C776713A24D10C9EA127B584EBB2EDA3F0FFFE247411F1069C
Participant Details
Original Note:
DOJ argues discrimination on the basis of “medical necessity” to which there is no consensus, and complicated by comorbidity factors. https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1581636/download “Currently, there is no universally sanctioned definition of “medical necessity”, but in clinical practice for gender affirming care” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8861822/#bib13
All Note Details