Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-04-29 15:07:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 497133677ED7DFD57F4B653B7C87BFBDA57E424B740509BB8B1B7BE54A2C7FBA
Participant Details
Original Note:
DOJ argues discrimination on the basis of “medical necessity” to which there is no consensus, and complicated by comorbidity factors. https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1581636/download “Currently, there is no universally sanctioned definition of “medical necessity”, but in clinical practice for gender affirming care” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8861822/#bib13
All Note Details