Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-04-29 08:27:56 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 6ECC09F043EC511927EFC497C68C367A7C1E2F19E9457C58B275F9AD25813646
Participant Details
Original Note:
DOJ argues discrimination on the basis of “medical necessity” to which there is no consensus, and complicated by comorbidity factors. https://www.justice.gov/opa/press-release/file/1581636/download “Currently, there is no universally sanctioned definition of “medical necessity”, but in clinical practice for gender affirming care” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8861822/#bib13
All Note Details