Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-07-02 22:04:20 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

In Roe v Wade there were findings of fact alleging real, tangible harm by the law. No such harm existed in 303 Creative’s case because they had never actually been asked to design a wedding website by a gay couple, let alone been punished for refusing. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/01/opinion/supreme-court-gay-303-creative.html

Written by 29A4A997A969F0CF291B0BEF0CC09F453D249DD0A2FAC99C3DD877CFE0A621B8
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 1675626485191696385
• noteId - 1675626485191696385
• participantId -
• noteAuthorParticipantId - 29A4A997A969F0CF291B0BEF0CC09F453D249DD0A2FAC99C3DD877CFE0A621B8 Participant Details
• createdAtMillis - 1688335460362
• tweetId - 1675478541264207874
• classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
• believable -
• harmful -
• validationDifficulty -
• misleadingOther - 0
• misleadingFactualError - 0
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 0
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
• trustworthySources - 1
• summary
• In Roe v Wade there were findings of fact alleging real, tangible harm by the law. No such harm existed in 303 Creative’s case because they had never actually been asked to design a wedding website by a gay couple, let alone been punished for refusing. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/01/opinion/supreme-court-gay-303-creative.html