Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-07-04 00:34:01 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 16179C6C254C4360C753F260C3BDC703F901C54AE4BA5008B335F950A3053790
Participant Details
Original Note:
In Roe v Wade there were findings of fact alleging real, tangible harm by the law. No such harm existed in 303 Creative’s case because they had never actually been asked to design a wedding website by a gay couple, let alone been punished for refusing. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/01/opinion/supreme-court-gay-303-creative.html
All Note Details