Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-07-04 01:33:03 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 00E74CAFADEFDA3B84793292E303E9A0465174A4230C9656461C859504F28681
Participant Details
Original Note:
In Roe v Wade there were findings of fact alleging real, tangible harm by the law. No such harm existed in 303 Creative’s case because they had never actually been asked to design a wedding website by a gay couple, let alone been punished for refusing. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/01/opinion/supreme-court-gay-303-creative.html
All Note Details