Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-07-03 16:31:40 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 43FD392A7B0525D059CE6EA30435B628605FE0A933E76486998BAC82F869B12E
Participant Details

Original Note:

In Roe v Wade there were findings of fact alleging real, tangible harm by the law. No such harm existed in 303 Creative’s case because they had never actually been asked to design a wedding website by a gay couple, let alone been punished for refusing. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/01/opinion/supreme-court-gay-303-creative.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1675626485191696385
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 43FD392A7B0525D059CE6EA30435B628605FE0A933E76486998BAC82F869B12E
  • createdAtMillis - 1688401900148
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 167562648519169638543FD392A7B0525D059CE6EA30435B628605FE0A933E76486998BAC82F869B12E