Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-07-02 23:24:20 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: B2BE438FCD3816C1EFD99CAAE9658A8F4C39179D96B5A2BFA57B5EF388A0EF9C
Participant Details
Original Note:
In Roe v Wade there were findings of fact alleging real, tangible harm by the law. No such harm existed in 303 Creative’s case because they had never actually been asked to design a wedding website by a gay couple, let alone been punished for refusing. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/01/opinion/supreme-court-gay-303-creative.html
All Note Details