Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-07-04 02:49:03 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: F7524D66E9FC0FCC4D04DA12FEF6A591079CC4CB230C9AE71A20D2FB75E19F7E
Participant Details
Original Note:
In Roe v Wade there were findings of fact alleging real, tangible harm by the law. No such harm existed in 303 Creative’s case because they had never actually been asked to design a wedding website by a gay couple, let alone been punished for refusing. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/01/opinion/supreme-court-gay-303-creative.html
All Note Details