Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-07-04 06:57:50 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 73036C903116356A12E7C6262CEF43818FCB7FB834C2CBAD8BE48FE4717AA519
Participant Details
Original Note:
In Roe v Wade there were findings of fact alleging real, tangible harm by the law. No such harm existed in 303 Creative’s case because they had never actually been asked to design a wedding website by a gay couple, let alone been punished for refusing. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/01/opinion/supreme-court-gay-303-creative.html
All Note Details