Birdwatch Note Rating
2023-07-03 14:24:59 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 5CB6D3B2B10A46842EAF6141E28304105B4A6AB83C844A7269DEDE4388EC2B12
Participant Details
Original Note:
In Roe v Wade there were findings of fact alleging real, tangible harm by the law. No such harm existed in 303 Creative’s case because they had never actually been asked to design a wedding website by a gay couple, let alone been punished for refusing. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/07/01/opinion/supreme-court-gay-303-creative.html
All Note Details