Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-10-25 16:15:22 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN on this opinion that these policies would be “consistent with the Nation’s historical tradition” of gun laws, the test established by Bruen https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/20-843#writing-20-843_OPINION_4 The other notes fail to understand that “well regulated” c. 18th century meant “properly trained,” not “restricted by law” https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-290.ZO.html

Written by C03CAD0A2B0E31BE9DD5C5D3A39EE67B6747E76B3C5D9F9CA4637705E03F539E
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 1849847230544355469
• noteId - 1849847230544355469
• participantId -
• noteAuthorParticipantId - C03CAD0A2B0E31BE9DD5C5D3A39EE67B6747E76B3C5D9F9CA4637705E03F539E
• createdAtMillis - 1729872922919
• tweetId - 1849802552696565785
• classification - NOT_MISLEADING
• believable -
• harmful -
• validationDifficulty -
• misleadingOther - 0
• misleadingFactualError - 0
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 0
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
• trustworthySources - 1
• summary
• NNN on this opinion that these policies would be “consistent with the Nation’s historical tradition” of gun laws, the test established by Bruen https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/20-843#writing-20-843_OPINION_4 The other notes fail to understand that “well regulated” c. 18th century meant “properly trained,” not “restricted by law” https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-290.ZO.html