Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-10-26 00:01:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 4FF132F5FC9B184E42DF3D5529C5344321574C7A0B24906A498ABEAE3CD32CFB
Participant Details
Original Note:
NNN on this opinion that these policies would be “consistent with the Nation’s historical tradition” of gun laws, the test established by Bruen https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/20-843#writing-20-843_OPINION_4 The other notes fail to understand that “well regulated” c. 18th century meant “properly trained,” not “restricted by law” https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-290.ZO.html
All Note Details