Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-10-25 23:56:36 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 65E197750F213DFCBFA76FA034C70A46E597B3DE44230430A077EA4CDF4F8B40
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN on this opinion that these policies would be “consistent with the Nation’s historical tradition” of gun laws, the test established by Bruen https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/20-843#writing-20-843_OPINION_4 The other notes fail to understand that “well regulated” c. 18th century meant “properly trained,” not “restricted by law” https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-290.ZO.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1849847230544355469
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 65E197750F213DFCBFA76FA034C70A46E597B3DE44230430A077EA4CDF4F8B40
  • createdAtMillis - 1729900596547
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 184984723054435546965E197750F213DFCBFA76FA034C70A46E597B3DE44230430A077EA4CDF4F8B40