Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-10-25 23:05:10 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 2AC052A83CB33B39C94D14B03F2BFC0F09EF98EA1FF54A2D1155AE065B44BEB8
Participant Details
Original Note:
NNN on this opinion that these policies would be “consistent with the Nation’s historical tradition” of gun laws, the test established by Bruen https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/20-843#writing-20-843_OPINION_4 The other notes fail to understand that “well regulated” c. 18th century meant “properly trained,” not “restricted by law” https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-290.ZO.html
All Note Details