Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-10-27 01:21:41 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: C9B3CC2F9B7AEBDFA50B0BDD65142010A775515C81127BE6E6CDB36384D47DB2
Participant Details
Original Note:
NNN on this opinion that these policies would be “consistent with the Nation’s historical tradition” of gun laws, the test established by Bruen https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/20-843#writing-20-843_OPINION_4 The other notes fail to understand that “well regulated” c. 18th century meant “properly trained,” not “restricted by law” https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-290.ZO.html
All Note Details