Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-10-26 00:05:54 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 6A00C190789901D89A0CCBED3B26719264DD4530C09DD2BA3FCF4F21D28E3CAE
Participant Details
Original Note:
NNN on this opinion that these policies would be “consistent with the Nation’s historical tradition” of gun laws, the test established by Bruen https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/20-843#writing-20-843_OPINION_4 The other notes fail to understand that “well regulated” c. 18th century meant “properly trained,” not “restricted by law” https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-290.ZO.html
All Note Details