Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-09-02 08:48:59 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN. The proposed note is irrelevant because the post accurately reflects the study. The tweet’s author does not claim that spoke protein is “still produced”. If you wish to debate the clinical significance of the study then do this in the replies rather than abusing CN.

Written by 49BF3CE85942DA914876A78581E9B56B4A56D04D7045B03C1A8FF6741145C8C2
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1697353695103430947

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1697894378797195745
  • noteId - 1697894378797195745
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 49BF3CE85942DA914876A78581E9B56B4A56D04D7045B03C1A8FF6741145C8C2 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1693644539913
  • tweetId - 1697353695103430947
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • NNN. The proposed note is irrelevant because the post accurately reflects the study. The tweet’s author does not claim that spoke protein is “still produced”. If you wish to debate the clinical significance of the study then do this in the replies rather than abusing CN.

Note Status History

createdAt timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus firstNonNMRStatus timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus currentStatus timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus mostRecentNonNMRStatus participantId
2023-09-02 08:48:59 UTC
(1693644539913)
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)
2023-09-04 02:38:47 UTC
(1693795127504)
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC
(-1)

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2023-09-02 16:10:59 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-02 15:57:21 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-02 09:36:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-02 08:21:50 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-02 08:01:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-02 07:26:15 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-02 06:44:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-02 06:32:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-02 06:17:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-02 05:42:31 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-02 05:11:39 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-02 05:09:55 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-02 03:56:54 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-03 06:33:25 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-03 00:19:07 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-03 00:06:05 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-04 09:40:18 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-05 13:54:08 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-05 12:08:48 -0500 Rating Details
2023-09-05 05:42:41 -0500 Rating Details
2023-10-05 13:40:30 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-04 13:35:10 -0500 Rating Details
2023-11-25 11:33:58 -0600 Rating Details
2023-11-28 11:41:55 -0600 Rating Details
2024-06-08 13:32:17 -0500 Rating Details