Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-04 14:40:18 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 85E068F1DD39C5C6DA10356E8D120EBB11C929D0C9251B0EC74DD2EF68E96915
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The proposed note is irrelevant because the post accurately reflects the study. The tweet’s author does not claim that spoke protein is “still produced”. If you wish to debate the clinical significance of the study then do this in the replies rather than abusing CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1697894378797195745
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 85E068F1DD39C5C6DA10356E8D120EBB11C929D0C9251B0EC74DD2EF68E96915
  • createdAtMillis - 1693838418448
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 169789437879719574585E068F1DD39C5C6DA10356E8D120EBB11C929D0C9251B0EC74DD2EF68E96915