Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-05 18:54:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 41E83706A7613EA12C68D01474490C335E08B229334E1C9EFBE792E751F2D8C4
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The proposed note is irrelevant because the post accurately reflects the study. The tweet’s author does not claim that spoke protein is “still produced”. If you wish to debate the clinical significance of the study then do this in the replies rather than abusing CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1697894378797195745
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 41E83706A7613EA12C68D01474490C335E08B229334E1C9EFBE792E751F2D8C4
  • createdAtMillis - 1693940048106
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 169789437879719574541E83706A7613EA12C68D01474490C335E08B229334E1C9EFBE792E751F2D8C4