Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-06-08 18:32:17 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 769D959E5DFA29321331053DC30A7431CAFDA11AD2B627F6D3E6EAD2225A2BF6
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The proposed note is irrelevant because the post accurately reflects the study. The tweet’s author does not claim that spoke protein is “still produced”. If you wish to debate the clinical significance of the study then do this in the replies rather than abusing CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1697894378797195745
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 769D959E5DFA29321331053DC30A7431CAFDA11AD2B627F6D3E6EAD2225A2BF6
  • createdAtMillis - 1717871537740
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1697894378797195745769D959E5DFA29321331053DC30A7431CAFDA11AD2B627F6D3E6EAD2225A2BF6