Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-03 05:19:07 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 074A2BACB8E91D04E73061156B519C3FFAD0742B080EFAFC49563F521EE70C24
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The proposed note is irrelevant because the post accurately reflects the study. The tweet’s author does not claim that spoke protein is “still produced”. If you wish to debate the clinical significance of the study then do this in the replies rather than abusing CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1697894378797195745
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 074A2BACB8E91D04E73061156B519C3FFAD0742B080EFAFC49563F521EE70C24
  • createdAtMillis - 1693718347652
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1697894378797195745074A2BACB8E91D04E73061156B519C3FFAD0742B080EFAFC49563F521EE70C24