Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-09-03 11:33:25 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 7110EC55CF293B20B5C6E03C45B5A7DB8A70FD50471A3EAE040F3111E899E479
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The proposed note is irrelevant because the post accurately reflects the study. The tweet’s author does not claim that spoke protein is “still produced”. If you wish to debate the clinical significance of the study then do this in the replies rather than abusing CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1697894378797195745
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 7110EC55CF293B20B5C6E03C45B5A7DB8A70FD50471A3EAE040F3111E899E479
  • createdAtMillis - 1693740805391
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16978943787971957457110EC55CF293B20B5C6E03C45B5A7DB8A70FD50471A3EAE040F3111E899E479