Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-08-26 18:24:47 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN. The post clearly reports the judge said the defendant did not meet the requirements for a public defender. Additionally, the main point of this post appears to be that the defendant wasn’t allowed bond, to which the proffered note is irrelevant.

Written by 55E75B8BC4C3EEE254248122D559B2B9DEA8472D7B40A18BC58261F0DC7FABC3
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 1695502565293850966
• noteId - 1695502565293850966
• participantId -
• noteAuthorParticipantId - 55E75B8BC4C3EEE254248122D559B2B9DEA8472D7B40A18BC58261F0DC7FABC3 Participant Details
• createdAtMillis - 1693074287137
• tweetId - 1695420482709749833
• classification - NOT_MISLEADING
• believable -
• harmful -
• validationDifficulty -
• misleadingOther - 0
• misleadingFactualError - 0
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 0
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
• trustworthySources - 0
• summary
• NNN. The post clearly reports the judge said the defendant did not meet the requirements for a public defender. Additionally, the main point of this post appears to be that the defendant wasn’t allowed bond, to which the proffered note is irrelevant.