Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-26 21:36:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E9D0F1D2D34F704AA6D31AAFB7E40F86FE8614062FBFEF50B3B523B2D114DA35
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The post clearly reports the judge said the defendant did not meet the requirements for a public defender. Additionally, the main point of this post appears to be that the defendant wasn’t allowed bond, to which the proffered note is irrelevant.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1695502565293850966
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E9D0F1D2D34F704AA6D31AAFB7E40F86FE8614062FBFEF50B3B523B2D114DA35
  • createdAtMillis - 1693085793998
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1695502565293850966E9D0F1D2D34F704AA6D31AAFB7E40F86FE8614062FBFEF50B3B523B2D114DA35