Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-26 19:40:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 53327D56C671EF08CAAA76E722E6A8A0EFD0CBA50EC3E7B16D9E6DBCBDBA090E
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The post clearly reports the judge said the defendant did not meet the requirements for a public defender. Additionally, the main point of this post appears to be that the defendant wasn’t allowed bond, to which the proffered note is irrelevant.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1695502565293850966
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 53327D56C671EF08CAAA76E722E6A8A0EFD0CBA50EC3E7B16D9E6DBCBDBA090E
  • createdAtMillis - 1693078830732
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 169550256529385096653327D56C671EF08CAAA76E722E6A8A0EFD0CBA50EC3E7B16D9E6DBCBDBA090E