Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-26 20:21:28 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C0FC9B06E4749216DE5808D039D3C81FD4C14EE0DF80B09F272E4913B5DA0669
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The post clearly reports the judge said the defendant did not meet the requirements for a public defender. Additionally, the main point of this post appears to be that the defendant wasn’t allowed bond, to which the proffered note is irrelevant.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1695502565293850966
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C0FC9B06E4749216DE5808D039D3C81FD4C14EE0DF80B09F272E4913B5DA0669
  • createdAtMillis - 1693081288553
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1695502565293850966C0FC9B06E4749216DE5808D039D3C81FD4C14EE0DF80B09F272E4913B5DA0669