Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-26 18:29:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 04243FCEE3704BBA1846E5009F2BA03EE36A98C381FDA424FCB38AB8C1B242BE
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The post clearly reports the judge said the defendant did not meet the requirements for a public defender. Additionally, the main point of this post appears to be that the defendant wasn’t allowed bond, to which the proffered note is irrelevant.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1695502565293850966
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 04243FCEE3704BBA1846E5009F2BA03EE36A98C381FDA424FCB38AB8C1B242BE
  • createdAtMillis - 1693074541912
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 169550256529385096604243FCEE3704BBA1846E5009F2BA03EE36A98C381FDA424FCB38AB8C1B242BE