Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-08-27 19:42:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3C24DD8CB1AD48565B4E2F0C7946384AF179C3B9D5E60A0053C8F76439A93651
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The post clearly reports the judge said the defendant did not meet the requirements for a public defender. Additionally, the main point of this post appears to be that the defendant wasn’t allowed bond, to which the proffered note is irrelevant.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1695502565293850966
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3C24DD8CB1AD48565B4E2F0C7946384AF179C3B9D5E60A0053C8F76439A93651
  • createdAtMillis - 1693165351826
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16955025652938509663C24DD8CB1AD48565B4E2F0C7946384AF179C3B9D5E60A0053C8F76439A93651