Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2023-05-25 18:53:05 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

The tweet references the 5-4 decision that narrows the EPA definition of wetlands. While the other 4 Justices also concur with the result of the ruling in this case (for other reasons), they did not concur on the narrowing of the EPA wetland definitions.

Written by 9CB2A511820CE49845967DE25FB59B3376524610C6EFA064E8AEA2AD45701EE0
Participant Details

All Information

• ID - 1661807615230328832
• noteId - 1661807615230328832
• participantId -
• noteAuthorParticipantId - 9CB2A511820CE49845967DE25FB59B3376524610C6EFA064E8AEA2AD45701EE0 Participant Details
• createdAtMillis - 1685040785019
• tweetId - 1661741261051809796
• classification - NOT_MISLEADING
• believable -
• harmful -
• validationDifficulty -
• misleadingOther - 0
• misleadingFactualError - 0
• misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
• misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
• misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
• misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
• misleadingSatire - 0
• notMisleadingOther - 1
• notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
• notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
• notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
• notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
• trustworthySources - 0
• summary
• The tweet references the 5-4 decision that narrows the EPA definition of wetlands. While the other 4 Justices also concur with the result of the ruling in this case (for other reasons), they did not concur on the narrowing of the EPA wetland definitions.