Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-25 19:39:46 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C8FD890ACCEE7FECEC4520F0E62CD97F8908DF0C210FB6D615394D4EF673E56F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet references the 5-4 decision that narrows the EPA definition of wetlands. While the other 4 Justices also concur with the result of the ruling in this case (for other reasons), they did not concur on the narrowing of the EPA wetland definitions.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1661807615230328832
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C8FD890ACCEE7FECEC4520F0E62CD97F8908DF0C210FB6D615394D4EF673E56F
  • createdAtMillis - 1685043586996
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1661807615230328832C8FD890ACCEE7FECEC4520F0E62CD97F8908DF0C210FB6D615394D4EF673E56F