Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-26 16:24:30 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CEFA31382E5E7935582537E0D5959A58F2E19B3F66E04BD0DA18549878FB3088
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet references the 5-4 decision that narrows the EPA definition of wetlands. While the other 4 Justices also concur with the result of the ruling in this case (for other reasons), they did not concur on the narrowing of the EPA wetland definitions.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1661807615230328832
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CEFA31382E5E7935582537E0D5959A58F2E19B3F66E04BD0DA18549878FB3088
  • createdAtMillis - 1685118270137
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1661807615230328832CEFA31382E5E7935582537E0D5959A58F2E19B3F66E04BD0DA18549878FB3088