Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-27 09:33:47 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 83C7C9DA1E73CC19925B834C43A0C065D2CAF71204A73B703887D5AFD266F4B9
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet references the 5-4 decision that narrows the EPA definition of wetlands. While the other 4 Justices also concur with the result of the ruling in this case (for other reasons), they did not concur on the narrowing of the EPA wetland definitions.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1661807615230328832
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 83C7C9DA1E73CC19925B834C43A0C065D2CAF71204A73B703887D5AFD266F4B9
  • createdAtMillis - 1685180027404
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 166180761523032883283C7C9DA1E73CC19925B834C43A0C065D2CAF71204A73B703887D5AFD266F4B9