Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-26 03:42:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 119F5DDA8EE5EEB3469B412CE6EF4FA65A583868931C709AA9F4EF87D48EE1EC
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet references the 5-4 decision that narrows the EPA definition of wetlands. While the other 4 Justices also concur with the result of the ruling in this case (for other reasons), they did not concur on the narrowing of the EPA wetland definitions.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1661807615230328832
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 119F5DDA8EE5EEB3469B412CE6EF4FA65A583868931C709AA9F4EF87D48EE1EC
  • createdAtMillis - 1685072526639
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1661807615230328832119F5DDA8EE5EEB3469B412CE6EF4FA65A583868931C709AA9F4EF87D48EE1EC