Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-25 19:26:17 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6E69E2AB8EA331521A6D06E2CEE26B3999D17CB033558C6BA0FFAD5F4495467D
Participant Details

Original Note:

The tweet references the 5-4 decision that narrows the EPA definition of wetlands. While the other 4 Justices also concur with the result of the ruling in this case (for other reasons), they did not concur on the narrowing of the EPA wetland definitions.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1661807615230328832
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6E69E2AB8EA331521A6D06E2CEE26B3999D17CB033558C6BA0FFAD5F4495467D
  • createdAtMillis - 1685042777246
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 16618076152303288326E69E2AB8EA331521A6D06E2CEE26B3999D17CB033558C6BA0FFAD5F4495467D