Birdwatch Note
2023-05-24 08:27:57 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Most submissions, even when free of glaring errors, are rejected before peer review (a.k.a 'desk rejected'). These are editorial decisions based on format, scope, innovativeness, and writing quality. These decisions are independent of the validity of the science. https://scientific-publishing.webshop.elsevier.com/publication-process/paper-rejection-common-reasons/
Written by A471F4ACAD34BE3696AFBA3AEA7EA40326BF373061A15131F0885F0FE75AE1A1
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1661120629355978753
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1661287907989020674
- noteId - 1661287907989020674
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - A471F4ACAD34BE3696AFBA3AEA7EA40326BF373061A15131F0885F0FE75AE1A1 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1684916877158
- tweetId - 1661120629355978753
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Most submissions, even when free of glaring errors, are rejected before peer review (a.k.a 'desk rejected'). These are editorial decisions based on format, scope, innovativeness, and writing quality. These decisions are independent of the validity of the science. https://scientific-publishing.webshop.elsevier.com/publication-process/paper-rejection-common-reasons/
Note Status History
| createdAt | timestampMillisOfFirstNonNMRStatus | firstNonNMRStatus | timestampMillisOfCurrentStatus | currentStatus | timestampMillisOfLatestNonNMRStatus | mostRecentNonNMRStatus | participantId |
| 2023-05-24 08:27:57 UTC (1684916877158) |
1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
2023-05-31 02:39:52 UTC (1685500792003) |
NEEDS_MORE_RATINGS | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 UTC (-1) |
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2023-05-24 03:41:49 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-24 04:05:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-24 05:27:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-24 11:06:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-24 09:16:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-24 07:47:43 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-24 16:49:09 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-24 03:30:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-24 05:53:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-24 04:59:12 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-24 09:15:17 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-24 07:33:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-24 10:47:16 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-24 03:43:49 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-24 09:49:01 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-24 07:08:21 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-24 21:19:13 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-05-29 09:40:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-01 12:42:02 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-09 09:35:15 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-11 18:24:54 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-06-14 03:29:59 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2023-08-05 05:58:55 -0500 | Rating Details |