Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-05-24 14:16:50 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B77AD7061E21D0437BEF30EE2AEBAC53AFA4D81A56F111F49854003169429273
Participant Details

Original Note:

Most submissions, even when free of glaring errors, are rejected before peer review (a.k.a 'desk rejected'). These are editorial decisions based on format, scope, innovativeness, and writing quality. These decisions are independent of the validity of the science. https://scientific-publishing.webshop.elsevier.com/publication-process/paper-rejection-common-reasons/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1661287907989020674
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B77AD7061E21D0437BEF30EE2AEBAC53AFA4D81A56F111F49854003169429273
  • createdAtMillis - 1684937810518
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1661287907989020674B77AD7061E21D0437BEF30EE2AEBAC53AFA4D81A56F111F49854003169429273